in , ,

Netizens react to possible misinformation about PH’s blacklisted by China over POGO issue

On Monday, October 10, Zubiri met with Chinese Ambassador Huang Xilian whom the former said alluded that the Philippines may be included in the blacklisted countries by China.

Sen. Juan Miguel Zubiri could’ve been lying when he said China has blacklisted the Philippines as a tourist destination over the recent issues concerning POGO firms.

On Monday, October 10, Zubiri met with Chinese Ambassador Huang Xilian whom the former said alluded that the Philippines may be included in the blacklisted countries by China.

“During our meeting with Ambassador Huang, the tone of his statement was that the Philippines is already being watched as a tourist hotspot and have been warning their countrymen of possible crimes that could happen to them due to POGO.

“Maybe it was lost in translation, and what the good Ambassador meant was we could be possibly blacklisted as he mentioned they do that to countries who promote gambling for their countrymen,” he told reporters.
Zubiri said that Huang first used the term “blacklist” which means there was a “strong possibility that we are either already in the list or could be added on that list” if the country continues to allow POGOs to operate.

“They do not know if Chinese nationals who go to the Philippines will be safe from illegal activities being done by the triad, by the syndicates operating Pogos. They may also be kidnapped and mistaken for POGO operators. So, that is the reason why there’s been a drop, a significant drop of Chinese tourists,” the Senate President said.

However, the Chinese embassy has denied ever threatening to blacklist the Philippines.

“The report of ‘tourist blacklist’ is misinformation. China has not placed the Philippines on its blacklist for tourism,” the Chinese Embassy told reporters in a message.

Due to the confusion, netizens began wondering if Zubiri either lied or was just misinformed.

https://twitter.com/derek27official/status/1579965002639114253?s=20&t=7-sPwx0phScMjuGVvntpMg

https://twitter.com/DrTonyLeachon/status/1579832346521391104?s=20&t=7-sPwx0phScMjuGVvntpMg

https://twitter.com/fir3manPH/status/1580011173935689728?s=20&t=7-sPwx0phScMjuGVvntpMg

On Wednesday, October 12, Zubiri stood by his statement.

The fault lies with the ambassador. He mentioned blacklisting, siguro baka nagkamali ang ambassador pero we stand by our statement na binanggit po ng ambassador ang word backlisting several times,” he told reporters.

Hindi ako nanaginip sa aking statement. Siguro nagkamali lang sila sa position but the word blacklisting came from the ambassador and we’d like to stand by that statement that he mentioned blacklisting several times,” he added.

Zubiri said he was shocked by the Chinese embassy’s denial.

I think it should have just been a clarification. Kasi clarification would mean clarify what the ambassador has said. But misinformation, lumalabas na para akong Marites na nagbibigay ng maling information or tinatawag na fake news. Eh di naman fake news yun eh daming nakakinig sa kanya.

Sya talaga ang nagkamali hindi kami, ang daming witness. Sya ang nagkamali. Maybe the misinformation came from…we were misinformed by the ambassador possibly,” he said.

Meanwhile, China expressed gratitude to the Philippines for halting POGO operations and rescuing Chinese nationals. 

“It is appreciated that relevant Philippine law enforcement agencies rescued a number of Chinese citizens and shut down some POGO companies during their operations,” the Chinese Embassy in Manila said in a statement.

“Crimes induced by and associated with Pogo not only harm China’s interests and China-Philippines relations, but also hurt the interests of the Philippines. It is therefore widely believed that social costs of Pogo far outweigh its economic benefits to the Philippines in the long run and Pogo should be tackled from the root so as to address the social ills in a sweeping manner,” it added.

Written by Charles Teves

ImeeSolusyon goes to Dingalan and Polillo Island

Sen. Tito Sotto claimed he proposed the SIM card bill 34 years ago before SIMs got invented